Advanced Search
      Login
 
Main Menu



Re-Engineering Primary Care Practice
Author: Scott F. Bateman, M.D.
Last Revised: Sat, 02-Feb-2002
Article Size: 17.42 KB


CLINICAL COMMENTARY

Re-Engineering Primary Care Practice

Scott F. Bateman, M.D.

Does your office function efficiently for both the patient and the staff? Do the phone and scheduling systems meet the demand of the office? For most practicing physicians the answer to these questions is often a resounding No! The dynamics of today's health care environment make it increasingly more difficult to practice in an environment that is pleasing to both physician and patient. All practices face growing overhead, discounted fees, shortage of qualified and motivated staff, and increased information and paperwork. Most of all, our clients, the patients, are expecting and demanding better service and value for their loyalty. Unfortunately, years of routine may institutionalize inefficiencies and prove costly to any medical practice. It is time to re-examine and to re-engineer the primary care practice. To succeed in this environment it is necessary to break with the routine and find better ways to operate. We must learn to work smarter, not harder. In order to accomplish this dramatic renovation we must look “outside the box" and explore new ideas. Physicians must be committed to take the lead in recognizing the problems and inviting the entire medical team to participate in the solution. Re-engineering the primary care practice is a monumental task that covers a multitude of areas. This paper will address only three shortcomings of our practice and how we have worked to improve patient access, phones, and customer service. What is discussed here may not be universally applicable to all practices. Each medical practice has its own needs and special considerations. But we must remember that it is well accepted that decreasing variability will improve patient care.1 If these problems are common to your practice, the solutions may be applicable.

Over the past year our office, UCLA Medical Group/Malibu, has engaged in a systematic process to assess problems and implement changes to improve our services.(Table 1) The effects have been very positive for the physicians, the staff and the patients. The staffing of our office consists of 3.75 FTE physicians, all Family Physicians practicing similarly. There are 11.5 FTE support staff of which one is a full time office manager. We see approximately 1200 patients each month with a broad based patient population from pediatrics to geriatrics. One physician sees obstetrics. We see a significant amount of trauma, perform multiple procedures, and provide extensive preventative health care.

Access to Care

"I am sorry, Mrs. G, but the doctor's next available appointment is two weeks from Thursday." "Doctor, Mrs. G insists on seeing you today." "Okay, double book her." "But you are already double booked all day." "Then just find a place for her."

This scenario creates stress for the patient, staff, and physician. An alternative to all scheduled appointments is "open access."2 With open access, every patient is given an appointment the day he or she calls. There are no scheduled appointments. This system was piloted in one practice of a Green Bay, Wisconsin area medical group, and it was so successful that all 18 of the group's sites have implemented the open access system.3 At one site, open access improved the group's poor financial performance by creating room in the schedule for more patients, which in turn generated more income. At Malibu, last year, when all patients scheduled their appointments, the scenario of Mrs. G was a daily stress. We evaluated our patient flow and realized that one-third of our patient visits were necessarily same day visits. After reviewing the open access model, we

Table 1: Assessment and Implementation Process
Step 1: Recognize and identify a problem. Step 2: Assess the problem. All individuals influenced by this problem should be involved in evaluating the extent, depth and breath of the problem. Step 3: Develop a plan to correct the problem. It may not be possible to address the entire problem at one time. Setting focused, reasonable goals will expedite the process. Step 4: Implement the plan. All individuals who may be affected by this change should be involved. Allow sufficient time and staff to implement the plan. Step 5: Evaluate the results of the implemented change at a finite and pre-designated time. Ask, "Have you reached your goal?" If not, what process can improve the outcome? If yes, where do you want to go from here? Step 6: Implement additional changes and set a time for re-evaluation.

Volume 6, Number 1 Winter 2002

decided that the change was too radical to be instituted at one time. Instead, we scheduled each physician with 25% "urgent care" slots during the day. These slots could not be filled until the morning of the visit. First, we to cleared the time slots in the schedule which required adjusting our schedules at least 3 months in advance. By scheduling follow-ups farther out, we were able to clear most of the backlog of visits. When we instituted the same day (urgent care) scheduling system, it was immediately obvious that our patients were extremely satisfied to be able to be seen on the same day. Our staff enjoyed the benefits of not having to deal with the Mrs. G scenario. Now they have the authority and ability to just say, "The doctor can see you at 3PM."

There is a minimal "no show" problem with the same day visits. On an average day our urgent care slots are 90% filled by 9:30AM. We are presently reassessing this scheduling plan (step 5) and will probably be moving to a 30% urgent care scheduling plan. Our urgent care slots are scheduled in the late morning and mid afternoon. Newer physicians may benefit from more urgent care slots than well-estab-lished physicians who see many follow-up visits with elder patients. Our preventative health periodic exams are still scheduled in advance, but the mother of a 15-year-old who needs her sports clearance physical "yesterday" is very pleased that a same day appointment is available. Each physician has a personal practice style and each practice is different, so it will take a significant amount of time and energy to plan for this type of change.

Phones

"I called the office, and all I got was an answering message." "I was kept on hold for fifteen minutes and then disconnected." "All I wanted to do was to ask for a refill on my medicines, and it took ten minutes." "I left a message for the office, but no one ever got back to me." "Doctor, you are hard to get a hold of."

Does any of this sound familiar? It certainly was a serious problem in our practice. We had instituted an AVA system (automated phone system with call directing capabilities) about one year ago when it became obvious that our phone system was severely limiting. The system was designed with enough mailboxes and message direction to run the Pentagon. But it just didn't work for us. We did not seem to have enough people to answer the phones; messages got lost; patients were very unhappy. In assessing the problem, a traffic study was requested from the phone company to monitor our phone activity. From this study we realized that on Monday mornings we had 500 phone contacts (incoming and outgoing). At 2PM we were deluged with calls that were transferred over to our back up system. Patients wanted to speak with a person not a message system. We realized that we were taking an inordinate amount of time handling prescription refills. Following several lengthy discussions with all parties involved, we developed a plan of action.

  1. All patients were advised to call the pharmacy for refills instead of the office. We instituted a 24-hour response time for all routine refills and worked with our local pharmacies to develop standard refill request forms that the pharmacies would fax to our office. Each physician is responsible to check the prescription board at noon and by 5PM. Prescriptions that require the patients' charts are pulled and placed on the physician's desk with the prescription request. All completed refill request forms are then faxed back to the pharmacy by the end of the day and filed accordingly. Phone calls decreased.

  2. The open access, urgent care scheduling plan has eliminated a significant amount of time the staff are on the phone since there is no need for the staff to check with the back office personnel or doctor before scheduling a needed appointment.

  3. At high volume times, we designate an extra staff member to answer phones. Every Monday morning, our office manager spends several hours assisting the staff on the phones.

  4. We no longer go "on service" during lunch, but schedule our staff so there is always someone answering the phones between 12-2PM. This has greatly alleviated the 2PM deluge of calls.

  5. All office staff are trained to handle phones and schedule appointments so our medical assistants can fill in as needed.

  6. Most importantly, we committed to answer all phone calls in person during office hours if possible. This required the participation of all office personnel.

Each change had a snowball effect on our phone problem. By eliminating most prescription refill calls, the staff had more time to address other phone issues. By recognizing our high volume times and keeping our phone lines open longer we found that we did not need more staff but could use our present staff more

Bateman Re-Engineering Primary Care Practice

wisely and efficiently. By involving our entire staff in solving this problem, we began developing a sense of team unity which has carried over into other areas. There are many other ways to improve phone interactions. Having a central phone number for the PCN referral system and a central intake number to preregister new patients will be helpful in economizing the phone usage at each office.

Customer Service

We are a service profession. Our major clients are our patients. In the past, physicians enjoyed great patient loyalty. But as the medical environment changes, physicians no longer command the patient loyalty once afforded to us. We have to work harder to offer a better value to our patients in order to stay viable in today's highly competitive setting. Insurance companies are looking at quality and outcomes. To survive and flourish, we must recognize that our patients are valued clients and they need to be treated as such. At Malibu, we found that we were frequently having negative patient-staff interactions. The patient who came in late or on the wrong day was chastised and told how disruptive this behavior was to the office. Over-booking and insurance changes put additional stress on the staff. This stress was transferred negatively to patient interactions.

Recognizing the problem, we decided to institute a customer service education program for our staff. The physicians and office manager chose an established course entitled "The Customer" by Integrity Systems.4 The office manager and an outside facilitator implemented the program. The program took ten hours, which included a four-hour introduction session and six one-hour follow-up sessions. All employees were required to attend. In order to accomplish this, the office was closed for one afternoon for the first session and the follow-up sessions were held immediately after lunch. The program covered most aspects of customer service. All sessions were highly interactive, requiring the staff to work in teams to solve problems common to a medical practice. Each team then shared the results with the group for further critique and discussion.

The program helped the staff recognize "who is the client." We have since developed better customer-service relationships with our patients/clients as well as other individuals we meet during our workday. The program provided guidance in dealing with stressful and difficult situations in a professional manner. It taught a team approach to problem solving. No longer should there be a "Who is to blame?" attitude but rather "How can I help fix it." The energy and positive attitudes that developed during this training program have carried over into the daily operations of the practice. Another benefit is that the staff felt empowered to take a proactive role in their practice. They have a sense of pride in who they are and what they do. They realize that they can call for help from any one of their teammates and that member of the team will respond in a positive and supportive way. As a result of this customer service program, we see a more professional and less stressed staff with an attitude of "How can I help" instead of "That's not my job." Our patients/clients are very impressed with the ambience and professionalism of our office. It is our goal to have all physicians complete an abbreviated course by the end of the year.

Conclusion

Re-engineering the primary care office practice is a monumental task. One might think it is too overwhelming to even attempt. This is not true. Each journey begins with the first step. This journey will take many years to complete. It will not happen by itself. No administrator will come to your office and wave a wand over your problems and make them go away. It requires the commitment and leadership to create change. Change does not occur in a vacuum, but requires examining the problem from many different points of view with an open mind to look "outside the box." This requires the input of every person who may be affected by the problem. It is extremely gratifying to identify a problem, process the problem as outlined in Table 1, and see the fruition of one's labors. It is necessary to reevaluate the problem periodically to ensure that the solution remains viable. Customer service needs to be nurtured, praised and rewarded in order for it to continue and flourish. Each time we reinforce a positive behavior, we are setting the standard for the future. A problem recognized is not an impediment, but an opportunity to improve.

REFERENCES

  1. Bateman SF. Will decreasing variability in practice patterns improve healthcare in the primary care setting? Proc UCLA Healthcare. 2000 Spring;4(1):16-18.

  2. White B. Starting a revolution in office-based care. Fam Pract Manag. 2001 Oct;8(9):29-35.

  3. Murray M, Tantau C. Same day appointments: exploding the access

  4. Willingham R. Hey, I'm the Customer. Prentice Hall; Englewood Cliffs (NJ). 1992.


Re-Engineering Primary Care Practice
© copyright 2009 Stephen Ng & UCLA Department of Medicine


© 2004-2009, Department of Medicine, UCLA
All rights reserved. We make no representations whatsoever about any other Web site that may be accessed through this site. When you access a non-DOM Web site, please understand that it is independent from our organization, and that we have no control over the content of that Web site
for patient related questions email:access@mednet.ucla.edu
for medical school admission info email:somadmiss@mednet.ucla.edu
for questions about this website email:DOMhelp@mednet.ucla.edu